On Thursday May 3rd residents of Newcastle City are being asked to vote in a referendum on whether they want a directly elected mayor to run the city’s affairs. Here are 5 reasons why I am voting ‘yes’ and would encourage all in Newcastle to do the same:
1.
The revival of the City. Following a century or so of national economies holding sway, the city is re-emerging as the primary economic and cultural unit, largely as a consequence of globalisation. Cities thus need the strong, distinctive, political leadership that a directly elected mayor would provide if they are to stand out as globally distinctive centres of ideas, creativity and wealth. The health of the city depends on such vibrancy.
2.
The need for economic leadership. Economic leadership in the North East has been woeful, and the decline of One North East has only exacerbated the constant and uncooperative bickering over meagre regional funds. As the region’s leading city Newcastle needs better than this, and a strong mayoral figure is the best hope for the economic nettle to be grasped and the potential prosperity of the region to be realised.
3.
Resist the magnet! There is a giant magnet standing strong in the South East corner of this country. It sucks in a vast amount of the nation’s talent, influence, investment and political attention. It is, of course, London. Yes, lots of people live in London, but 80% of English persons do not. And it is becoming ever more apparent that the centralised nature of the English settlement is not serving the regions well, particularly harming the cities of the Midlands and the North. Resistance to this trend requires alternative centres of influence emerging, and an elected mayor is in a vastly superior position to resist the pull of London than a council leader who is in the throes of the Westminster-saturated main political parties.
4.
A chance to end local politicking. Having national political parties compete in municipal elections has not served local governance well. Local government should be about serving the city as effectively as possible, overseen by a council whose concern is entirely for that happen. As it is, there are innumerable political pressures that flow both within the party groupings and between the council chamber and the executive office, that often have very little to do with what’s best for the city as opposed to what is best for particular individuals or mini political cartels. By voting for a directly elected mayor there is a chance to bypass this wasteful and unwholesome politicking by electing an independent mayor whose sole concern is the welfare of the city.
5.
Ultimate accountability. Currently, if you think the council is doing a bad job, you can’t vote out the leader (unless you happen to be in the minority whose ward is the ward of the leader). With an elected mayor you would be able to do that. Surely a good thing.